Okay, here’s my attempt at sharing my “ray piloto” experience, blog-style:
Alright folks, let’s dive into my weekend project: playing around with Ray and its Pilot framework. I’ve been hearing buzz about it for a while, and figured it was time to actually get my hands dirty.
First things first, I installed Ray. Pretty straightforward, just a simple pip install ray
. No dramas there. Then, I went hunting for some decent documentation on Pilot. Honestly, it was a bit scattered, but I pieced it together.
Next up, I wanted to get a feel for how Pilot actually works. I started with a really basic example – trying to optimize a simple function. Think something like def my_function(x, y): return (x - 2)2 + (y - 3)2
. The goal? Find the x
and y
that minimize the result.
I fumbled around a bit setting up the search space. Pilot uses this concept of “Search Spaces” to define the possible values for your parameters. I defined ranges for x
and y
, something like x
between -5 and 5, and y
between -5 and 5. Took a few tries to get the syntax right, kept messing up the dictionary structure.
Then came the interesting part: choosing a search algorithm. Pilot supports a bunch – Random Search, Bayesian Optimization, you name it. For this simple example, I just went with Random Search to start. Kept things simple. I configured the algorithm and hooked it up to my objective function.

I kicked off the optimization run. Ray spun up a bunch of workers and started churning through different x
and y
combinations. I watched the progress in the Ray dashboard. It was pretty cool to see all the workers busy, trying out different values.
The results? Not bad! Random Search isn’t the smartest algorithm, but it got me pretty close to the optimal values (x
=2, y
=3). I then swapped out the Random Search for Bayesian Optimization (using Tune), and the results got significantly better, and faster!
Of course, I had my fair share of headaches.
- Dependency Hell: Getting all the right versions of Ray, Tune, and the search algorithm libraries to play nicely together was a bit of a pain. Spent a good chunk of time wrestling with
pip
. - Configuration Chaos: Pilot’s configuration can be a bit verbose. Lots of nested dictionaries and options. Easy to make a typo or get something wrong.
- Debugging Woes: When things went wrong, it wasn’t always easy to figure out why. The error messages weren’t always super helpful. I ended up doing a lot of print-debugging.
Overall, I’d say it was a worthwhile experience. Ray Pilot seems like a powerful tool for automating hyperparameter tuning and other optimization tasks. It definitely has a learning curve, but once you get the hang of it, it can save you a lot of time and effort. I’m looking forward to trying it out on some more complex problems!
What’s next? Well, I’m thinking of tackling a small machine learning project and using Ray Pilot to optimize the model’s hyperparameters. Stay tuned for that!
Key Takeaways:
- Ray Pilot is powerful, but be prepared for some initial setup hurdles.
- Start with simple examples to get a feel for the framework.
- Pay close attention to your dependencies and configuration.
- Don’t be afraid to print-debug!